I'm certainly excited about the performance improvements we'll see as more developers fully optimize their software for Apple's silicon. beta-optimized applications M1 is amazing.
Chosing a mac for photo editing pro#
Even when running unoptimized application versions, the MacBook Pro M1 still struggles with a super powerful editing PC, and the fact that it is able to outperform the PC on some tests while in use. Overall, he says, there is no reason for photographers to hold back. For reference, my office did the same export in 1:20.Īlthough Hoyle didn't give any comparisons, he said there was “no problem” working with 4K files in DaVinci Resolve Studio, a high-end video editing and color correction application. The Intel version of Premiere took 6 minutes, 25 seconds to export to the MacBook M1, but the optimized beta M1 took about half the time, at 3 minutes, 24 seconds. However, the PC was still much faster when it came to video. The M1 version of Lightroom also beat the PC when it comes to importing 100 raw images. It took 22 seconds to align the layers and 46,6 seconds to merge them - an overall time faster than my extremely powerful editing rig was able to achieve. However I then performed the same tests on the beta version of Photoshop which supports Apple M1.
The PC took 20 seconds to align the layers and 53 seconds to merge them - a clear victory for the PC. I compared this to an exceptionally powerful Windows desktop PC that was built with an AMD RyX processor, Nvidia RTX Titan graphics, and 128GB of RAM, specifically to be a beast with photo editing and editing. Intel-based Photoshop, via Rosetta 2, took 50,3 seconds to align the layers and 1 minute and 37 seconds to merge them. It is a technique that I use regularly in the photography of my products, so it is important for me to have good efficiency here.
Chosing a mac for photo editing full#
I tested how long it took for Photoshop (both in the beta versions of Intel and M1) to line up 19 raw images at full resolution and then merge them into a stacked image. He found that the MacBook Pro M1 with 16GB of RAM didn't compete when running Intel-based Photoshop, but that was another story when he tried the M1 beta. Hoyle is CNET 's leading European photographer. Professional photographer Andrew Hoyle said he was "amazed" by the performance and concluded that a Mac M1 is a safe bet for photographers looking to modernize. 'editing photos and had a whopping 128 GB of RAM. An M1 MacBook Pro photo editing test found that the 13-inch M1 MacBook Pro running M1-optimized apps was faster than a "beast" of a Windows desktop PC - despite the latter being specifically designed for it.
0 kommentar(er)
